Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1442 Corvina


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to List of minor planets: 1001–2000. North America1000 19:29, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

1442 Corvina

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I couldn't establish that it meets WP:NASTRO or WP:GNG. Long-standing tradition to redirect these to the list page; recent discussions suggested not to do this with those numbered less than 2000, which would need a proper discussion as to their notability. Boleyn (talk) 06:30, 3 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. North America1000 15:50, 3 April 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
 * Redirect per WP:NASTRO. No suitable references found. Praemonitus (talk) 15:54, 6 April 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Nakon  03:48, 12 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Redirect. The only study I could find of this one specifically appears to have chosen it more or less arbitrarily as a comparison object in the same family as the much-more-notable 243 Ida. I don't think it's enough; for instance, it's not a significant enough object even to be mentioned in our article about the family it belongs to. —David Eppstein (talk) 04:35, 17 April 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.