Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1486 Marilyn


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Overall consensus to keep even if it is weak, (non-admin closure) – Davey 2010 Talk 00:56, 17 June 2015 (UTC)

1486 Marilyn

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Doesn't meet WP:NASTRO or WP:GNG. I think it should be deleted; or (preferably) per NASTRO, redirected to List of minor planets: 1001-2000. Boleyn (talk) 19:52, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:07, 27 May 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Weak Keep: this one appears to have a few sources available on Google scholar. It may be barely notable. Praemonitus (talk) 15:28, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Weak keep. I found only an old orbital study and two period determinations   but maybe it's enough. —David Eppstein (talk) 18:11, 28 May 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 00:43, 3 June 2015 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Redirect 3 references that do little but characterize orbital elements over the span of ~80 years... not really impressed by that. Headbomb {talk / contribs / physics / books} 00:43, 5 June 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 09:04, 10 June 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.