Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/14th Feb - The Deadline (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. ‑Scottywong | confabulate _ 01:59, 17 July 2014 (UTC)

14th Feb - The Deadline

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Poorly-sourced article about a non-notable short film which will be published on YouTube. Fails WP:NFILM. - MrX 14:39, 7 July 2014 (UTC)


 * All Reliable sources related with the film found at google search, and updated with all required criteria. This Article should 'Keep' at Wikipedia for information related with this Awareness Short Film --Amitdatta29 (talk) 18:28, 7 July 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete - Still fails WP:NFILM. References are IMDB (does not by itself confer notability per NFILM), two refs are from the production house founded by the director, final is essentially a list of photo galleries for local events saying nothing except that the film was screened. -Xpctr8 (talk) 21:39, 7 July 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep' - If search in google with same Film name, there are multiple references appearing. News, Release, Trailer, Film Song etc. Where it's getting fail to put at wikipedia? --202.54.83.29 (talk) 05:04, 8 July 2014 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. - MrX 14:41, 7 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. - MrX 14:41, 7 July 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete - there is no significant coverage in independent reliable sources with an emphasis on reliable sources. Simply point to a bunch of Google search results nad claiming they represent multiple references is insufficient.  Specific coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject need to be shown.  I do not see that in the artiole, nor am I able to find any. -- Whpq (talk) 20:17, 8 July 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete. I cannot find anything to show that this short film passes notability guidelines. Sources may exist in another language, but I doubt that there would be enough for the film to pass notability guidelines. I can find things that show that the short exists, but existing is not notability. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   04:22, 9 July 2014 (UTC)

To understand our deletion rationales, please review WP:GNG and WP:RS, and then WP:NF. Best,  Schmidt,  Michael Q. 06:32, 9 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep - What reference Wikipedia expecting more than a News or a Trailer or a Review for particular Film in any language? There are all sources available in Google if Search with "14Th Feb - The Deadline short film". What's fun in deleting a good awareness Film with no specific reason? --Ajayd29 (talk) 06:00, 9 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete - newly released short film that requires more commentary (analysis, reviews, etc.) in reliable sources in order to meet WP:NF. Its existence is not in doubt. Allow undeletion or recreation only ir or when more independent sources come forward.  Schmidt,  Michael Q. 06:32, 9 July 2014 (UTC)


 * Sorry The above comment was not from same User. It was from me. May be here we used same IP for the comment. But Seems you are not tracking user as it's existence ! --202.54.83.29 (talk) 07:19, 9 July 2014 (UTC)
 * My bad. Sorry. Unstruck. We still have the issue of a lack of independent reliable sources.  Schmidt,  Michael Q. 08:19, 9 July 2014 (UTC)


 * Sorry to bother - Can you check the Article? I am adding more reliable Sources. Before taking any decision. Please consider it. --Amitdatta29 (talk) 08:31, 9 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Okay... I appreciate your efforts, but please read WP:SIGCOV and also WP:OEN. In the article, Siddam News is a short blurb that confirms cast, crew, and plot (not really in doubt), ankitaproduction.com is the production company's website, and while WP:SELFPUB can verify information without establishing notability, the first raagalahari.com offers a gallery of stills and confirms its July 6 screening at Prasad Studios (Preview Theater), and the second ragalahari.com offers only a tad more than does Siddam News, but none opf these offer any commentary or critical response. Short films have a difficult (but not impossible) task showing notability enough for Wikipedia inclusion. Can you bring forward any media reviews of the film's screening in Hyderabad?  Schmidt,  Michael Q. 12:42, 9 July 2014 (UTC)


 * - Sure, will do it. --Amitdatta29 (talk) 13:18, 9 July 2014 (UTC)


 * - I will add Press Release link along with Media Review link here. Please consider any decision after that. --Amitdatta29 (talk) 08:47, 10 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Media reviews, fine... but press releases are not suitable for establishing notability.  Schmidt,  Michael Q. 09:04, 10 July 2014 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.