Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1500 Jyväskylä


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was keep. Ichiro (会話| + |投稿記録|メール) 01:04, 25 February 2006 (UTC)

1500 Jyväskylä

 * Delete Vane and unnotable. Google results in merely 557 hits, and Google Groups 0. Don't see a reason why create an article for every cosmic object. — nlitement [talk]  20:21, 19 February 2006 (UTC)
 * This afd nomination was orphaned. Listing now. —Crypticbot (operator) 19:42, 19 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Strong keep This is a Solar System "geography" stub -- Ruby  22:25, 19 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep as relatively notable (i.e., main belt) as far as asteroids go. I can't see how this is vanity, either. -- Kinu  t /c  22:56, 19 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep don't see it expanding in the next few centuries but no reason to delete either.   Dl yo ns 493   Ta lk  23:55, 19 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep this and any other verifiable asteroid that anyone actually bothers to write an article about. u p p l a n d 04:01, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep Ardric47 23:21, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment: somehow this is listed twice on the AfD page (for me at least). Is this a bug? Ardric47 23:27, 22 February 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.