Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/150 wins 150 saves


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Wizardman Operation Big Bear 19:10, 6 September 2010 (UTC)

150 wins 150 saves

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Per discussion here, this list of two people isn't notable enough to be its own page, but should be a footnote on the Wins and Saves pages. Muboshgu (talk) 04:36, 2 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Baseball-related deletion discussions.  —Muboshgu (talk) 04:38, 2 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete: the feat isn't really all that notable... I know some would say "well, the fact that it's so exclusive that only two people have accomplished it would warrant an article", but I don't think that necessarily applies here. (And to be honest, the development of "specialty" pitchers has kinda lessened the importance of each of these feats.)  Azzurre  ( talk ) 04:44, 2 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete Not really an article about a topic but just a statement of the fact that only these two people have done this. There is not much else to say.Steve Dufour (talk) 05:20, 2 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete: not enough coverage of this as a topic to warrant a separate list; can easily be made a footnote in the lists of top pitchers in wins and saves to compensate for its removal. &mdash; KV5  •  Talk  •  11:44, 2 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete Per Azzurre. DARTH SIDIOUS 2 (Contact) 16:50, 2 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete We really have too many of these club articles for sports stats that don't really satisfy GNG. The all-time leaderboards (though top 500 is a bit crazy IMO) and a few of the classics like 300 win club, 500 HR club, etc, but we go into really nitty-gritty detail sometimes. Staxringold talkcontribs 17:39, 2 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - Until significantly more pitchers achieve this "milestone" and until it gets more widespread attention, it would suffice to note in the Smoltz and Eckersley articles that they are the only two pitchers to accomplish this. Of course, it is still a bit of a freak stat, in that if you made it 140-140 at least one more pitcher would enter the "club", etc. If it was 300-300 I'd be more inclined to treat this as significant. Rlendog (talk) 02:11, 3 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete per Azzurre. Joaquin008  ( talk ) 10:05, 5 September 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.