Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1528 Conrada


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to List of minor planets: 1001–2000. Spartaz Humbug! 18:59, 20 April 2015 (UTC)

1528 Conrada

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I couldn't establish that it meets WP:NASTRO or WP:GNG. Long-standing tradition to redirect these to the list page; recent discussions suggested not to do this with those numbered less than 2000, which would need a proper discussion as to their notability. Boleyn (talk) 06:29, 3 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. North America1000 15:51, 3 April 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
 * Comment – I am seeing some references for this object on Google scholar. Praemonitus (talk) 19:27, 3 April 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 03:12, 11 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Redirect. There's an old report about its orbital elements, inclusion in a more recent orbital study of a half-dozen asteroids , and a lot of papers about other things that happen to include the old report in a list of reports. Without any indication of what might be special or interesting about it and its orbit, I don't think it's enough. —David Eppstein (talk) 04:29, 17 April 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.