Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/152 (film)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was    Keep per WP:SNOW with no one afirmatively arguing for deletion. Eluchil404 (talk) 00:23, 20 September 2008 (UTC)

152 (film)

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Contested prod for which original tagger raised notability issues. Note that i have no opinion on this. Excirial ( Talk, Contribs ) 17:54, 16 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep - This short horror movie is by a notable American director working in Japan. It was the official selection at 2 film festivals. Why are you trying to delete it?? miniluv (talk) 18:04, 17 September 2008 (UTC)
 * As i already said this is purely procedural. If a prod if opposed and later re-added the proper cause of action is starting an AFD and not re-adding the prod. As i sayd before, i have no opinion on this. Excirial ( Talk, Contribs ) 19:27, 17 September 2008 (UTC)
 * If you have no opinion, why are you trying to delete the article? Why didn't you just leave it alone instead of starting an AFD??miniluv (talk) 19:51, 17 September 2008 (UTC)
 * It doesn't matter that it was directed by a notable person because it has to be notable itself. About the film festivals, it would only be notable if it won an award. Schuy m 1  ( talk ) 22:44, 19 September 2008 (UTC)


 * Weak Keep. I'm inclined to Keep, though I concur that the sourcing is an issue - I doubt very much that the article can be expanded at this point, there just isn't enough there. It's a servicable stub, but I don't know how much more can be added. Even if notability can be shown here, and I think two film festival selections is a good start, it might be simpler overall to merge this article to the director's and redirect the title. UltraExactZZ Claims~ Evidence 13:26, 18 September 2008 (UTC)
 * There is nothing wrong with stubs. Schuy m 1  ( talk ) 22:47, 19 September 2008 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.   --  Fabrictramp  |  talk to me  23:20, 18 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep. sources are available for expansion and notability.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 22:41, 19 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep: per MQS. Schuy m 1  ( talk ) 22:44, 19 September 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.