Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1563(number)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. ( X! ·  talk )  · @229  · 04:29, 22 February 2010 (UTC)

1563(number)

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Number with no assertion of importance. Ipatrol (talk) 00:19, 15 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete, unencyclopedic trivia. Hairhorn (talk) 01:30, 15 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. WP:NUMBER suggests that a number needs "at least three unrelated mathematical properties" to be notable. We have one here (it's the smallest number with the property that its first 4 multiples contain the digit 6) - so two more are required. StAnselm (talk) 06:34, 15 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete, I don't think the only mathematical property mentioned about this number is sufficient for notability. J I P  | Talk 07:22, 15 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete per StAnselm.  Anna Lincoln  08:40, 15 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. Agreed, one property does not notability make. UltraExactZZ Said~ Did 20:53, 15 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete per StAnselm. I can't even conceive of any other important property, or find any decent sources. Bearian (talk) 02:06, 16 February 2010 (UTC)
 *  Keep and rename to 1563 (number)  Are you kidding me?  This is the the smallest number with the property that its first 4 multiples contain  the digit 6.  What more do you want?  Kidding.  Delete. TJRC (talk) 02:24, 16 February 2010 (UTC)
 * 1563, 3126, 4689, 6252 - hey! it actually works! That is so neat. StAnselm (talk) 02:35, 16 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete If this number has an article, shouldn't 1564, 1565, etc. all have articles?Rin tin tin 1996 (talk) 11:43, 16 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete This number has no entry in The Penguin Dictionary of Curious and Interesting Numbers. -- Radagast3 (talk) 00:18, 17 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Merge with 1000 (number) which is intended to cover 1000 - 1999. See WikiProject Numbers. Thincat (talk) 20:15, 19 February 2010 (UTC)
 * I went ahead and merged the relevant content. Which was one number fact. StAnselm (talk) 20:40, 19 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Thank you. Thincat (talk) 22:33, 19 February 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.