Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1577 Reiss


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to List of minor planets: 1001–2000. (non-admin closure) Mr. Guye (talk) 23:47, 27 May 2015 (UTC)

1577 Reiss

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I couldn't establish that this meets WP:NASTRO or WP:GNG. I think it should be deleted or (preferably) redirected to List of minor planets: 1001-2000. Boleyn (talk) 19:10, 18 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. North America1000 07:48, 19 May 2015 (UTC)


 * Weak Redirect per WP:DWMP: One photometry study found, consisting of a rotation period and amplitude with little other information. There is also a study of multiple inner belt asteroids, but all that had was a data entry. Praemonitus (talk) 15:39, 19 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Redirect. My findings match those of Praemonitus. —David Eppstein (talk) 20:05, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.