Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1590 Tsiolkovskaja


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. (WP:NPASR). North America1000 22:18, 16 June 2015 (UTC)

1590 Tsiolkovskaja

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Doesn't meet WP:NASTRO or WP:GNG. I think it should be deleted; or (preferably) per NASTRO, redirected to List of minor planets: 1001-2000. Boleyn (talk) 19:50, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:05, 27 May 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Weak keep. I found two lightcurve studies  and a paper that cites a third one from 1977, putting it among the first 100 or so asteroids whose spin rate was determined (according to the citing paper). —David Eppstein (talk) 06:45, 28 May 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Davewild (talk) 21:02, 2 June 2015 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Davewild (talk) 20:43, 9 June 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.