Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/15th century AH


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   speedy keep. nomination withdrawn due to expansion Mgm|(talk) 11:19, 9 February 2009 (UTC)

15th century AH

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

The entry is an unnecessary duplicate of Islamic calendar. (Compare to 13th century AH which actually has content of events in that period). Mgm|(talk) 13:10, 5 February 2009 (UTC)


 * Keep. I see no reason why this article couldn't be expanded to summarize notable events that occurred during this period, similarly to the other AH century articles. I note that this century has yet to complete, but I don't see why that should be an obstacle to the article's creation. JulesH (talk) 09:37, 6 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep Normally, I would have said that it doesn't matter, since if it's deleted, the redlink will still be there and somebody would then attempt to make it a viable article. In this case, it does matter-- an editor decided to make a viable article on January 25.  I give the nominator credit for not immediately nominating this-- looks like MgM waited ten days to see if anything was happening, and it wasn't-- but other contributions from the editor indicate a person who is knowledgable about Arab and Islamic history, so I think that this is in capable hands.  Since we are in the "15th century AH" (the Islamic year "1430 AH" began on December 28, 2008, a few years before "2009 AD"), and since the last 30 years have been a period where Islamists have had significant influence on world history, I'd tend to encourage someone to make an article about this.  Mandsford (talk) 21:25, 6 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Islam-related deletion discussions.   --  Fabrictramp  |  talk to me  01:17, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
 * I actually waited a lot less. I came across this article in uncategorized pages patrol and checked if there were any recent edits. Since the reason to nominate no longer applies. I'm withdrawing the nomination. - Mgm|(talk) 11:19, 9 February 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.