Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1606 Jekhovsky


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to List of minor planets: 1001–2000. Deryck C. 20:49, 22 April 2015 (UTC)

1606 Jekhovsky

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I couldn't establish that it meets WP:NASTRO or WP:GNG. Long-standing tradition to redirect these to the list page; recent discussions suggested not to do this with those numbered less than 2000, which would need a proper discussion as to their notability. Boleyn (talk) 06:22, 3 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. North America1000 15:10, 3 April 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
 * Comment the suggestion is to not to automatically redirect or delete, but to examine each to see if it should be kept as an article or redirected to the list, per discussions at WT:ASTRO/WT:AST -- 65.94.43.89 (talk) 03:27, 5 April 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, j⚛e deckertalk 00:31, 12 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Redirect. No evidence of individual notability per WP:NASTRO. —David Eppstein (talk) 04:39, 17 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Comment: Redirect where to?  Sandstein   20:43, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Comment My suggestion would be List of minor planets: 1001–2000. Boleyn (talk) 22:17, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.