Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1614 Goldschmidt


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to List of minor planets: 1001–2000 - After being up 3 weeks and the keep !voter not really expanding on his reasons for keeping it seems the best outcome here is to redirect like the rest of these. (non-admin closure) – Davey 2010 Talk 01:58, 29 May 2015 (UTC)

1614 Goldschmidt

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Doesn't meet WP:NASTRO or WP:GNG. Delete / redirect per NASTRO to List of minor planets: 1001–2000. Boleyn (talk) 07:42, 2 May 2015 (UTC) Boleyn (talk) 07:42, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:17, 4 May 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
 * Keep: Three photometric studies. Praemonitus (talk) 15:22, 4 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Weak redirect. I only see two studies  and another Google scholar hit that turns out to be a paper that shares a page with one of those two studies. But one of those studies is solely about this object, which is why the "weak". —David Eppstein (talk) 19:10, 6 May 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Davewild (talk) 17:01, 15 May 2015 (UTC)


 * {|cellpadding=0 style="border-top: 1px solid #A3A3A3; border-bottom: 1px solid #A3A3A3; background-color: #FFFFFF" align=left width=auto


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Davewild (talk) 17:10, 22 May 2015 (UTC)
 * }
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.