Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/163.com


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was KEEP. The information presented later is of overwhelming importance. -Splash talk 02:27, 7 December 2005 (UTC)

163.com
Delete and Merge with NetEase. Article has been around for a half a year, has no content, no real inbound links, site doesn't seem notable or has no indication of importance. Dbchip 04:18, 1 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Please read Guide to deletion. Delete and merge are not compatible. - Mgm|(talk) 10:49, 1 December 2005 (UTC)


 * Delete  ε  γκυκλοπαίδεια  *  (talk)  04:18, 1 December 2005 (UTC)
 * All we need here is a simple Redirect to NetEase. Saberwyn 04:40, 1 December 2005 (UTC)
 * I will also support a delete. Either way's fine by me. Saberwyn 08:49, 1 December 2005 (UTC) but not based on the arguments below. Saberwyn 09:57, 3 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete mainly notorious as a source of spam.   Dl yo ns 493   Ta lk  08:25, 1 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Redirect to NetEase. This is substub spam. - Mgm|(talk) 10:49, 1 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete this and NetEase as well - merely a couple of sub-standard websites. --Ezeu 11:05, 1 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete Ashibaka (tock) 13:45, 1 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep This is the 10th most visited website in the world according to Alexa.com . Way more popular than Wikipedia. Sumahoy 00:20, 2 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep Please do some research before making nominations. Chinese people won't be able to vote to keep this because wikipedia is banned in China at the moment. CalJW 10:47, 2 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Comment. Currently the Chinese article zh:网易 (I think that's the Chinese name for the NetEase company) is more about 163.com than about the company. Also unfortunately just a 小作品 (stub). Anyway, keep and expand as one of the most notable websites there is. Kusma (talk) 19:49, 2 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep The world's tenth most visited website is certainly a highly notable subject. The article needs a rewrite but should definitely be kept.  Cool3 22:12, 5 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep Kappa 03:55, 6 December 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.