Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/16874 Kurtwahl


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to List of minor planets: 16001–17000. Paul Erik (talk) (contribs) 03:25, 2 July 2014 (UTC)

16874 Kurtwahl

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Notability concerns. Laun chba  ller  22:29, 22 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Someone please explain to me why we have bots creating articles?-- Laun  chba  ller  22:31, 22 June 2014 (UTC)


 * Comment ClueBot2 is an extremely effective vandal reversion bot. It no longer creates articles, and my understanding is that no bots are creating articles any more. This article goes back six years. Cullen328  Let's discuss it  23:20, 22 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Redirect to List of minor planets/16801–16900 as a non-notable asteroid. I've added one reference from Google Books, which verifies it exists but doesn't count as significant coverage as required by the notability guideline for astronomical objects. The list article contains numerous unreferenced asteroids so this one now stands out by having some content beyond its name and position, as well as a reference. It might be a good idea to come up with an outcome preference here. Philg88 ♦talk 09:08, 23 June 2014 (UTC)
 * I believe that all unreferenced stubs should be flat out redirected.-- Laun  chba  ller  10:16, 23 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:31, 23 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Sure, but this one is no longer an unreferenced stub.
 * Sure but the reference, which should mention that's its on page 919, lacks stat info to show whether its relevant for https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_notable_asteroids Delete? See: http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=aeAg1X7afOoC&printsec=frontcover&source=gbs_ge_summary_r&cad=0#v=onepage&q=Kurtwahl&f=false Gregkaye (talk) 16:24, 23 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Reference fixed. I don't think the asteroid is notable as a separate topic, hence the !vote to redirect to an article where it's already listed. The info from the reference can be used there instead. Philg88 ♦talk 16:34, 23 June 2014 (UTC)


 * Redirect to List of minor planets: 16001–17000 per WP:NASTRO. StringTheory11 (t • c) 17:41, 23 June 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.