Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1696 Nurmela


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. North America1000 12:10, 6 June 2015 (UTC)

1696 Nurmela

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Doesn't meet WP:NASTRO or WP:GNG. Should be deleted; or (per NASTRO) redirected to List of minor planets: 1001-2000. Boleyn (talk) 06:35, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:08, 4 June 2015 (UTC)


 * Keep: The second largest member of the Baptistina family was the subject of a study as to whether it was the cause of the K/T impactor, as well as a photometry study. There may be a couple of other sources as well. Praemonitus (talk) 16:00, 4 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep. The fact mentioned by Praemonitus is in the title of one of his sources. Along with those two, here's another lightcurve study . I think that gives it enough breadth of coverage for notability. —David Eppstein (talk) 00:36, 5 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Nomination withdrawn per above. Boleyn (talk) 05:37, 5 June 2015 (UTC)
 * For the convenience of other reviewers, you might want to follow WP:WDAFD. Thank you. Praemonitus (talk) 17:12, 5 June 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.