Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/170 RCACS


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Speedy Delete per Author's Request (and below, of course). Cbrown1023 20:44, 7 January 2007 (UTC)

170 RCACS

 * — (View AfD)

This unmaintainable article about an unremarkable air cadet squadron contains no information, only an ephemeral list of current members, a cryptic list of "camps" (which appear to be programs of some sort), and an unexplained list of locations. WP:NOT ➥the Epopt 00:36, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete this page. My name is Zazzer and I fully agree with what all of you are saying. Go ahead. I'm not stopping you. (P.S.:I'm the page creator.) Zazzer 14:36, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Nothing to suggest anything notable about the squadron or its members. WJBscribe (WJB talk) 01:47, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, would fail WP:ORG. --Dhartung | Talk 02:00, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete notability not asserted Akihabara 02:02, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete The camps & locations are common to any RCAC squadron, so there is no need for inclusion in the article. The rest is non-notable. Caknuck 02:18, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete non-notable. --Haemo 02:21, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. MER-C 03:33, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, non-notable. Terence Ong 05:30, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete of couse. Not notable.--Meno25 09:03, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete non-notable squadron.-- danntm T C 19:27, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete- non-notable. --TeckWizTalk Contribs@ 21:00, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - article is about the current line-up or group of cadets; poorly written and non-notable because no historical perspective provided. Ronbo76 23:09, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete NN. —dima/s-ko/ 02:21, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - The article violates What Wikipedia is not policy. Wikipedia is not a webspace provider (see WP:NOT).  Also, since there does not exists enough source material to write a verifiable, encyclopedic article about the topic, the topic is notNotability.  The article probably was created under a misunderstanding of what Wikipedia is.  Since all the information in the article already is at the topics web site according to the article, deleting the article will not cause the contributors to lose any information. Delete for these reasons and the reasons set out in the nomination. -- Jreferee 05:05, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.