Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/179424673 (number)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was DELETE. Linuxbeak | Talk 19:05, 16 October 2005 (UTC)

179424673 (number)
Not notable. linas 05:15, 10 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, non-notable number. &mdash; J I P | Talk 06:49, 10 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Not exceptional significance, see WikiProject Numbers for criteria. Rememeber to fix wikilinks first . -- Egil 07:14, 10 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete not exceptionally interesting. Xoloz 15:07, 10 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete &mdash; I merged the trivial factoid about the prime into 100000000 (number). &mdash; RJH 15:16, 10 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Speedy per nom for 427 (number); if not, delete. PacknCanes 22:48, 11 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Strong Keep Real number, notability is not a criterion for deletion. Notable as beeing 1,000,000th prime. Klonimus 02:48, 12 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. As above. Jitse Niesen (talk) 17:08, 12 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Umm, relevance? Rhetoricalwater 22:05, 12 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete to set a precedent before we move on to 1.1, 1.01, 1.001 ... -- red stucco 08:24, 14 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete Masterhatch 10:32, 15 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete Half of the article talks about this or that that the article is not. Perhaps it could be mentioned in an article on prime numbers. Cool3 04:03, 16 October 2005 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.