Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/180 (drink)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Drmies (talk) 15:11, 7 February 2012 (UTC)

180 (drink)

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Real product, possibly popular, not notable. Like most beverages there is an entry on the trade website bevnet. Otherwise there is no significant coverage, and there is little hope of expanding this article past ingredients, sizes, and availability. ▫  Johnny Mr Nin ja  22:56, 27 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete: Possibly notable, but the article is kind of hopeless. Other than the ingredients and nutrition facts, there's nothing. Agent 78787 (talk) 23:09, 27 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 00:05, 28 January 2012 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Bryce  ( talk  &#124;  contribs ) 00:53, 4 February 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete, the article fail to explain why the drink is notable. The brewery-energy drink claim is false, per talk page. Thuresson (talk) 19:01, 4 February 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.