Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/180 Nutrition


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  21:11, 11 July 2018 (UTC)

180 Nutrition

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This is a promotional article about a non-notable company. The references that are indepedent barely even mention the company (some don't seem to mention it at all). This company lacks a depth of coverage (WP:CORPDEPTH). This article was created deceptively by a single-purpose account by hijacking a redirect at the title nutritional and then moving it to this title. ANDREVV (talk) 14:25, 4 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Hhkohh (talk) 14:32, 4 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Hhkohh (talk) 14:32, 4 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. North America1000 09:46, 5 July 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete. Small nutritional supplements company. Very little coverage in a BEFORE. Sources in article are mainly interviews or based on PR.Icewhiz (talk) 10:51, 5 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom and Icewhiz -- Whats new?(talk) 02:49, 6 July 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete Non notable weak coverage, most of the references are interviews Heshiv (talk) 10:23, 9 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete No solid RS - fails WP:GNG. Deathlibrarian (talk) 11:57, 9 July 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.