Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1874 Northwich FC


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   merge to Northwich Victoria F.C..  MBisanz  talk 04:43, 24 December 2012 (UTC)

1874 Northwich FC

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Article is about a recently (Nov 2012) formed football (soccer) team. Only sources are two very local news reports. Therefore fails WP:NCORP criteria. Team will be playing at the very lowest level of regional football therefore currently fails the notability criteria advised at WP:FOOTYN. Because this team has only just been formed and has no track record or wider impact, the article only serves as a news announcement at the moment. I'd argue that the article should only ever be re-created once the team has had significant success and impact beyond its home town. Sionk (talk) 14:05, 16 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Merge to Northwich Victoria F.C. for now, although it's clearly a different entity. The situation at Northwich Victoria and the setting up of this breakaway club is worth mentioning there, but until this new club reaches a level where it would be considered notable we shouldn't have an article here. --Michig (talk) 15:16, 16 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Merge per Michig sounds a pretty good solution. Information can then be spun into a separate article if 1874 Nortwich do become notable. Keresaspa (talk) 15:45, 16 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Merge per Michig and then semi-protect both this and Northwich Victoria's articles for the short term, because I can easily see this being a target for vandalism, based on the acrimonious nature of the split in the first place. Lukeno94 (talk) 16:11, 16 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep Victoria are a semi-pro side therefore I think 1874 Northwich are notable as a breakaway of said entity. Mikeo34 (talk) 16:17, 16 December 2012 (UTC)
 * No. That's a classic WP:INHERITED argument. --Michig (talk) 16:53, 16 December 2012 (UTC)
 * I think WP policies have to broken sometimes, in exceptional cases such as this. I believe 1874 Northwich are probably soon-to-be semi-pro, or at least not far off it. Perhaps you should give your own opinion for once and not relentlessly link to WP articles. This article is of huge concern to all non-league football fans, and I think deleting it would be petty and just plain ridiculous. Mikeo34 (talk) 17:18, 17 December 2012 (UTC)
 * I always give my own opinion. I also understand our policies and guidelines. --Michig (talk) 18:52, 17 December 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete Not notable. - Presidentman talk · contribs (Talkback) 00:08, 17 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 05:36, 17 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 05:36, 17 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. &#9733;&#9734; DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 05:36, 17 December 2012 (UTC)


 * Merge and redirect as above. GiantSnowman 09:06, 17 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Merge and redirect -- This is all too recent for a judgement to be possible as to what will happen eventually. I would not be surprised if the new club does not end up looking like a successor of Northwich Victoria.  Peterkingiron (talk) 16:58, 17 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Merge and redirect – If the club does start playing it would likely join the NWCFL in the 2013–14 season but before then, it should just be a subsection on the NVFC article.  Del ♉ sion 23  (talk)  19:34, 19 December 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.