Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/18th (CTA)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was keep. Note that there's no decent reasons for deletion - a station ain't a schedule. The main reason given to keep (there are other similar articles) is equally worthless. So, default to keep. Proto /// type  14:48, 3 July 2006 (UTC)

18th (CTA)
Wikipedia is not a transit guide. D e nni &#9775;  19:06, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
 * No vote, but I am interested to see how this turns out as there are a ton of similar articles on Wikipedia. --cholmes75 (chit chat) 19:09, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep. This is still a stub. It would be better with photos of the murals mentioned in the article and some discussion of the neighborhood where it is located. TruthbringerToronto 19:54, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom KleenupKrew 20:55, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, Wikipedia is not a transit schedule. --Coredesat talk 22:36, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Strong keep railway station, looks like the whole system is being put up but taking its time. No reason to delete as these are practically always kept as goegraphical features of importance, even if infrequently served (which this is not). SM247 04:45, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Strong keep. We have a precedent of articles not only for other CTA stations, but for places like New York and London.  See some of those articles for an idea of what these pages could look like if expanded and given greater detail.  And finally, there is nothing here which explicitly states that metro stations are not valid topics. -- SmokeDetector47( TALK ) 03:06, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.