Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1900 Katyusha


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Davewild (talk) 20:49, 12 May 2015 (UTC)

1900 Katyusha

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Doesn't meet WP:NASTRO or WP:GNG. Should be deleted or redirected to List of minor planets: 1001–2000 per NASTRO. Boleyn (talk) 20:45, 4 May 2015 (UTC) Boleyn (talk) 20:45, 4 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:53, 4 May 2015 (UTC)


 * Weak keep. Included in two recent photometric studies of small sets of asteroids, one older collection of observations on many asteroids  and a recent proposal for asteroid flyby missions . It's not much material to go on but I think it's enough. —David Eppstein (talk) 20:04, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep: Concur with D. Eppstein. Praemonitus (talk) 22:20, 7 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Withdraw nomination per convincing opinions above. It's borderline, but I've been convinced it just about tips to notability. Boleyn (talk) 18:55, 12 May 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.