Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1902 Software Development Corporation


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America1000 08:45, 17 June 2017 (UTC)

1902 Software Development Corporation

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Seems to be just a random technology company with no notability; sources are just generic listings or don't actually mention company. A search produced only job listings, forum posts, and their website and social media; not even a single mention in any article. As such, fails WP:COMPANY Hazarasp (talk) 11:44, 9 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 13:07, 9 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 13:07, 9 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 13:08, 9 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Asia-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 13:08, 9 June 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete: A WP:SPA article by  setting out the company's wares. Nothing in the article indicates more than a run-of-the-mill company going about its business, the given sources don't mention it, and my searches are finding better. Fails WP:CORPDEPTH, WP:GNG. (Possible CSD A7/G11.) AllyD (talk) 17:01, 9 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete - COI piece about a company that lacks significant coverage in reliable sources. Only hits I could find are job listings and company profiles. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 00:12, 10 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete self-posted spam for non-notable company Jimfbleak - talk to me?  06:43, 10 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete I've removed most of the offending text but it still fails WP:CORPDEPTH and GNG. -- HighKing ++ 11:01, 12 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete, looks like unsourced advertising to me. --XenonNSMB (talk, contribs) 01:35, 14 June 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete as per nom and above. Domdeparis (talk) 11:11, 14 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete All I can find about this company are its own website and various things its job listings (fails WP:RS). There's no indication it's done anything notable (fails WP:GNG), and it seems like it's also a WP:PROMOTION violation. - GretLomborg (talk) 18:32, 15 June 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.