Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1904 Massevitch


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to List of minor planets: 1001–2000.  MBisanz  talk 03:04, 17 May 2015 (UTC)

1904 Massevitch

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Doesn't meet WP:NASTRO or WP:GNG; delete and redirect to List of minor planets: 1001–2000. Boleyn (talk) 18:11, 21 April 2015 (UTC) Boleyn (talk) 18:11, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. North America1000 21:15, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
 * Redirect per WP:DWMP: it does receive brief mention in a few scholarly articles, but the content is insufficient to establish notability. Praemonitus (talk) 16:34, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Weak keep as having an unusual combination of characteristics (V-type but located in the outer main belt) —David Eppstein (talk) 19:27, 22 April 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 00:32, 29 April 2015 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 02:49, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Redirect to List of minor planets: 1001–2000 &mdash; appears to fail WP:GNG and WP:NASTRO. -- slakr \ talk / 19:57, 16 May 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.