Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1907 UniFeb


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

1907 UniFeb
The result was Delete. Keilana | Parlez ici 02:13, 13 April 2012 (UTC)


 * – ( View AfD View log )

Unnotable supporter group without reliable sources. Cloudz 679 20:17, 28 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Cloudz 679 20:24, 28 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Turkey-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 01:42, 29 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 01:44, 29 March 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete - no evidence of notability. GiantSnowman 09:16, 29 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Could you provide your analysis of the Google News hits linked above that led you to this conclusion? Phil Bridger (talk) 22:45, 2 April 2012 (UTC)


 * Merge - Fenerbahçe S.K. -- Esc2003 (talk) 05:27, 4 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein   12:01, 5 April 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete fails WP:N. --Jimbo[online] 17:16, 9 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Could you provide your analysis of the Google News hits linked above that led you to this conclusion? Phil Bridger (talk) 19:30, 9 April 2012 (UTC)
 * WP:GHITS don't confer notability. There's no significant third-party media coverage that I could find to approve notability. --Jimbo[online] 21:02, 9 April 2012 (UTC)
 * I didn't claim that the number of hits confers notability, but that you should explain how the specific sources found by the Google News (not web) search linked above, many of which appear to be reliable and to be specifically about the subject, are insufficient. Phil Bridger (talk) 21:16, 9 April 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete - no proof of notability. Mentoz86 (talk) 20:25, 9 April 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.