Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1908 in comics


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   merge to 1900s in comics. (non-admin closure) czar   &middot;   &middot;  04:02, 20 June 2013 (UTC)

1908 in comics

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

As with many of the other related articles this one lacks any notability and sources. Maybe the author can create a series of by decade articles and merge this into it. Otherwise it just doesn't hold up on its own. Ad Orientem (talk) 04:01, 13 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Merge this and other 1900-1909 in comics articles to the 1900s in comics. None of them have enough content to stand on their own, and most likely never will. For what it's worth, this one (like 1885 in comics, was created to de-orphan Harold R. Heaton. Argento Surfer (talk) 12:39, 13 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:41, 13 June 2013 (UTC)


 * Merge per Argento Surfer. An article on the decade is perfectly sufficient.  While we're on the topic, 1910 and 1912 ought to be merged into 1910s and 1925, 1928, and 1929 should be merged into 1920s, as none of them have enough content to be worth annual articles.  Grandmartin11 (talk) 16:58, 13 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Merge Looking through all those in the decade 1900 to 1909, there isn't much there at all, and it easier to just stick them all on one page together.  D r e a m Focus  23:16, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.