Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1909–10 Stoke F.C. season


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Fenix down (talk) 15:43, 14 September 2020 (UTC)

1909–10 Stoke F.C. season

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

The team was playing non-league football and so fails WP:NSEASONS. REDMAN 2019 ( talk ) 13:59, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions.  REDMAN 2019  ( talk ) 13:59, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone  15:01, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone  15:01, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone  15:01, 7 September 2020 (UTC)


 * Comment All these seasons pages up for deletion, I don't know why, but I feel it's unfair to delete the Stoke season pages here. The information is correct, GNG hasn't been established, however it could be if one wants to try. If an editor can created one article for the period, that would be a lot of information on one article, keeping the statistics down, and shortened tables maybe. Then maybe a Redirect to each part of that new article. However, a straight up delete would remove all the legitimate information for the period, and really, I am against doing that. Govvy (talk) 15:22, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. Lightburst (talk) 17:36, 7 September 2020 (UTC)


 * Keep The Southern League was considered a professional league at the time see these previous afds here and here article is also at a high standard so should pass WP:GNG.--Add92 (talk) 17:47, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep per Add92. GiantSnowman 18:40, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Speedy Keep - I fail to understand why User:REDMAN 2019 is doing this. Please withdraw these poor nominations! Nfitz (talk) 22:32, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
 * I am merely finding non-league season articles and asking others opinion on it. User:Nfitz has made a perfectly good vote but needs to remember to be WP:CIVIL. REDMAN 2019  ( talk ) 15:54, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
 * No incivility here. They are poor nominations. That's civil. And you aren't "asking others opinion on it" are you User:REDMAN 2019? Why do you make such a claim? Where did you ask these questions? I can't see them. You started, not one AFD process, but similar seasons for the same team, ignoring WP:BEFORE, ignoring past convention, ignoring WP:ATD, and ignoring WP:NOTAVOTE. Why any of these oddball seasons for mostly fully-professional teams wouldn't be a simple redirect I don't know ... don't start the AFD until people have problems with the redirect! And why haven't you withdrawn these clearly flawed nominations already? Nfitz (talk) 00:35, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
 * I was nominating these to find out weather or not Southern League seasons were notable or not. Since the consensus is that they are notable there will be no more nominations on said season articles. REDMAN 2019  ( talk ) 10:57, 10 September 2020 (UTC)


 * Keep per above. Useful sports stats article. Batmanthe8th (talk) 04:56, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep I agree with others here --FootyMessi9147 (talk) --FootyMessi9147 (talk) 05:55, 9 September 2020 (UTC) — FootyMessi9147 (talk&#32;• contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * Keep per Add92.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 10:37, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep, rare article containing the league tables for B&DL. Frietjes (talk) 13:24, 14 September 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.