Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1910 population census in Croatia (Brdovec)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete all. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont)  15:38, 1 September 2018 (UTC)

1910 population census in Croatia (Brdovec)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

WP:NOT for statistics, and lack of notability for the census of one municipality in one year.

Also nominated for the same reason are:
 * 1910 population census in Croatia (Dubravica)
 * 1910 population census in Croatia (Zaprešić)

If this gets closed as "delete", please also delete the then empty Category:1910 population census in Zagreb County and Category:1910 population census in Croatia, and the then useless Template:1910 population census in Zagreb County. Fram (talk) 10:55, 24 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Croatia-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 11:32, 24 August 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete all. Each of these duplicates content already in the article for each settlement (Brdovec, Dubravica, Zagreb County and Zaprešić respectively). If there were a good reason to split any or all of those articles per WP:CONSPLIT or WP:SIZESPLIT, and the information were accordingly removed from the parent articles, then these would be appropriate, so neither notability nor WP:INDISCRIMINATE is the concern here, strictly speaking. But there's no reason why any of the relevant sections in those articles would need to be split, so no reason for these to exist separately. – Arms &amp; Hearts (talk) 23:44, 25 August 2018 (UTC)
 * There is reason why it stand separate. Some towns and municipalities have over 100 settlements so it would be too much for one article about town or municipality. Also in town/municipality article there is data for the total population (which stand there only for the reason if you delete separate article), and in separate article about all of settlements. That's the only reason why i make it separate. Also iwill delete tabela in the article of town/municipality itself if majority of comments will stand on the side to keep alive this separate articles.--Rethymno (talk) 00:00, 30 August 2018 (UTC)


 * Comment these certainly aren't reasonable stand-alone articles, but why not redirect to the towns? power~enwiki ( π, ν ) 03:33, 27 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Because they are very unlikely search terms? Fram (talk) 06:57, 27 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete all: these can easily be contained within their main articles. I agree with Arms & Hearts that WP:SIZESPLIT is the applicable policy here. — Bilorv(c)(talk) 01:12, 30 August 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.