Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1913 Sekanina


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to List of minor planets: 1001-2000. No need to delete then redirect. (non-admin closure) Esquivalience t 00:15, 27 May 2015 (UTC)

1913 Sekanina

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Doesn't meet WP:NASTRO or WP:GNG. I think it should be deleted; or (per NASTRO) redirected to List of minor planets: 1001-2000. Boleyn (talk) 12:10, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete and redirect title to List of minor planets: 1001-2000. The subject fails WP:NASTCRIT and WP:GNG.- MrX 15:01, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Only delete or redirect (assuming not individually notable) if Boleyn rewrites List of minor planets: 1001–2000 to include a collapsible box with all the data content in every asteroid article they are sending to AfD, which number in the hundreds. If this is not done, I vote that Boleyn be deleted from Wikipedia.  Please opine whether you agree that Boleyn should be deleted from Wikipedia.--Milowent • hasspoken  16:30, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete and redirect per WP:NASTRO; barely any content. OhNo itsJamie Talk 15:13, 21 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:45, 23 May 2015 (UTC)


 * Redirect. Mentioned in several papers as having a close encounter in 1981 with 165 Loreley which may assist in the determination of Loreley's mass. But it's barely more than a line in a table in those papers and I think the notability for this encounter should mainly go to Loreley. —David Eppstein (talk) 23:42, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.