Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1919 - Misfortune's End


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. WP:SNOW  MBisanz  talk 00:14, 8 March 2009 (UTC)

1919 - Misfortune&

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

This obscure novel appears to have been self-published (it is the only title on the publisher's web site), and I am unable to find any reviews or significant media coverage for its release. Does not appear to meet WP:BK standards. Pastor Theo (talk) 02:28, 3 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete - agreed. I can't find a RS to support why this is notable. More than happy to revert my position if notability can be demonstated. -- Storm  Rider  03:12, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per Pastor. No RS, no reviews; the novel is as self-published as the article (see the article's history). Drmies (talk) 05:46, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete self-published book. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  14:07, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions.  -- the wub  "?!"  15:09, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. Self-published, non-notable. Doctorfluffy (robe and wizard hat) 07:23, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per non-notability as stated by Storm Rider Shawnpoo (talk) 18:23, 7 March 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.