Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1919 Market Street


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. ‑Scottywong | verbalize _ 15:57, 18 March 2015 (UTC)

1919 Market Street

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Not Notable. Just another office building being constructed. GeorgeLouis (talk) 07:01, 11 March 2015 (UTC)


 * It's a residential building, and there are at least three other articles of equivalent significance already in existence: Murano (skyscraper), The Residences at The Ritz-Carlton (Philadelphia) and 1706 Rittenhouse. Geracudd (talk) 07:05, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Please review the WP:OTHERCRAPEXISTS which lists some fundamental arguments to avoid in deletion discussions. That being said, I don't find those other articles comparable as they each have a unique assertion to notability that this article could not, in its current state, claim. Further, those buildings have significantly more coverage about them, and perhaps more importantly, they've been built. Mkdw talk 22:10, 15 March 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete - whether it is a residential building or a commercial building is irrelevant. It needs to be historically significant or to have been the subject of significant coverage in multiple reliable sources. The problem with highlighting other stuff that exists is that two of the three above are of questionable notability too. The third is in the top-10 tallest buildings in Philly and is the tallest residential building. With half as many floors, this one doesn't come close. We don't need articles for every nondescript building in every city. Wikipedia isn't a directory.  St ★ lwart 1 1 1 07:25, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete per Stalwart. Pax 09:12, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. 16:05, 11 March 2015 (UTC) Antigng (talk) 16:05, 11 March 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete - No different from any other building being constructed in the world, Perhaps it's just me but I'm just seeing no point to this article. – Davey 2010 Talk 17:56, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete No assertion of notability. Keri (talk) 18:02, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete It might be notable after a century, not now. Antigng (talk) 00:20, 12 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pennsylvania-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 16:06, 12 March 2015 (UTC)


 * Snow Delete an article about a 29 story apartment building in Philly. No assertion of notability, no sigcov, and possibly even WP:FUTURE coming into play since it's about a building not fully built yet. Mkdw talk 22:06, 15 March 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.