Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1924–25 Lega Sud


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep and I will history merge this version with the existing draft. Whether to merge the different seasons into one article can be discussed further elsewhere. –&#8239;Joe (talk) 11:30, 5 May 2022 (UTC)

1924–25 Lega Sud

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Previously deleted article. Non notable football season. Insufficient references to satisfy GNG. Whiteguru (talk) 02:11, 20 April 2022 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 02:08, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Football and Italy. Whiteguru (talk) 02:11, 20 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 04:13, 20 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 18:37, 20 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete - no evidence of notability. GiantSnowman 18:38, 20 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep and merge all Lega Sud season articles into one article. Sorry, but terrible nomination, the 1920s Lega Sud is an important part of historic Italian football, the seasons should be merged into one article. There are numerous Italian books on the histories of Italian football and this league has a lot of mentions. I am also confused why you are nominating one article in this series. Govvy (talk) 19:07, 21 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep - an early second tier of the ancestor of one of the great Leagues. Definitely notable.  In Vitrio (talk) 23:05, 21 April 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Comment. This page was not previously deleted as claimed by the nom. It was previously unilaterally moved to draft space at Draft:1924–25 Lega Sud.  Draftifying is not deletion by policy.  If kept, the draft should be history merged back in to maintain attribution as the new article is quite clearly a copy-paste with the addition of a few new refs. SpinningSpark 16:35, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete (for copy-paste issues and no attribution), or ATD merge (not "keep and merge") all to single article per Govvy with draft "history merged back" for noted (and needed) attribution.  --  Otr500 (talk) 04:00, 4 May 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.