Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1932 Jansky


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to List of minor planets: 1001–2000. Davewild (talk) 16:22, 15 May 2015 (UTC)

1932 Jansky

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Doesn't meet WP:NASTRO or WP:GNG. Delete / redirect per NASTRO to List of minor planets: 1001–2000. Boleyn (talk) 07:23, 2 May 2015 (UTC) Boleyn (talk) 07:23, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:04, 4 May 2015 (UTC)


 * Redirect. Used as an example in a paper about how to compute the orbital elements of asteroids with highly inclined orbits but it's really only a line in a table there and I don't think it's enough. —David Eppstein (talk) 06:54, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Redirect per WP:NASTRO (WP:NASTCRIT) No significant coverage found on this object itself. Everything on google scholar is about lists of several asteroids (explicitly mentioned in NASTRO as not meeting notability). Inconveniently, it appears a lot of the results relate to its namesake, Jansky, who had publications in 1932.    &#8213;  Padenton &#124;&#9993;  17:16, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.