Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1957–58 UE Lleida season


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 01:51, 20 March 2021 (UTC)

1957–58 UE Lleida season

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Similiar to the scenario in the 1960–61 UE Lleida season, I can't see how this article would pass WP:GNG. HawkAussie (talk) 23:31, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. HawkAussie (talk) 23:31, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. HawkAussie (talk) 23:31, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Spain-related deletion discussions. HawkAussie (talk) 23:31, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 23:52, 12 March 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete - no evidence of notability. GiantSnowman 08:29, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete - BDFutbol and RFEF don't even seem to cover this although the former does have the squad list for the season prior to this one. Even if this squad list could be sourced somewhere, there's still no evidence that this is notable enough for a stand-alone article as per WP:GNG, which requires significant coverage from independent sources. Seems to be a case of WP:IINFO to me. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 14:13, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete There is not any significant coverage which can meet WP:GNG. Grailcombs (talk) 15:03, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete I don't see any advantage against the league season article. In fact, this article is missing information which could easily be added, games, league data, etc. Still, as pointed out, it clearly fails WP:GNG, it is possible this could change for the article to pass GNG, but in it's current state, completely fails out-right. Govvy (talk) 10:56, 15 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete: Coverage not found and fails GNG. TheDreamBoat (talk) 06:09, 16 March 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.