Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1957 Fargo Tornado


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Redirect as this is obvious enough to close (NAC). SwisterTwister  talk  06:28, 21 March 2016 (UTC)

1957 Fargo Tornado

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable natural disaster, no references, no evidence of notability, fails to meet the requirements of WP:GNG and does not appear to meet the requirements of any of the subject-specific guidelines. KDS 4444 Talk  13:18, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of North Dakota-related deletion discussions.  /wiae   /tlk  13:46, 15 March 2016 (UTC)


 * Redirect to 1957 Fargo tornado. They appear to be the same tornado. The existing article has some sources, and there are more sources available, including this photo series by North Dakota State University, this report from the National Weather Service, this scan of a report compiled by Ted Fujita (developer of the Fujita Scale) and this USA Today story. /wiae   /tlk  14:01, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Redirect - to 1957 Fargo tornado. A GF first edit, but the article already exists. — Maile (talk) 14:07, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Redirect to 1957 Fargo tornado. A quick search results in many sources, including many articles noting its 50th anniversary. It's clear to me that any storm that destroyed 1,300 homes and killed 13 is notable enough for its own article. —LinkTiger (talk) 14:18, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Redirect per LinkTiger — Preceding unsigned comment added by Berti118 (talk • contribs) 20:01, 16 March 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.