Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1970s retro movement (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. And don't judge people just by the color of their link. W.marsh 03:15, 29 January 2007 (UTC)

1970s retro movement
Following to the deletion of the 80's list as the same reason as that list, as this article seem to have been taken over by this pointless lists, therefore nominated for deletion. Well if this page don't go, then the list must go. This list is rather tedious and retro should be left for other TV shows or whatever. Also another reason is this is an unsourced list. Dr Tobias Funke 10:34, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete pending somebody producing reliable sources to show this could receive scholarly treatment. If it can, then this is in dire need of cleanup. GassyGuy 19:29, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment An article nominated for deletion by a red link and supported by a red link? Is this for real?  Oh, still, Delete, looks like pure unusable garbage without any intent to make it an article at all.  The movement might be real, though, and could use an article written when someone gets around to asserting its reality.  KP Botany 03:25, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Does the fact that I'm a red link mean something? My acount was activated 30 April 2006... is that not enough experience for me to opine about deletion? GassyGuy 07:05, 26 January 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.