Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1972 Cup Winners Cup final


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was keep. Ichiro 05:27, 13 January 2006 (UTC)

1972 Cup Winners Cup final
A final not notable enough to have its own article, delete or possibly merge usable content into Rangers F.C. and Dynamo Moscow. -- Elisson • Talk 23:01, 7 January 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete, I wouldn't like to have an article for every final match played for all football competitions ever (Cup Winners' Cup was abolished a few years ago). --Angelo 23:12, 7 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete since I don't believe any single football match with the possible exception of the 1966 World Cup final is actually independently notable. And even that is only because I'm English :-). Just zis Guy, you know? [T]/[C] [[Image:Flag of the United Kingdom.svg|25px|  ]] AfD? 23:23, 7 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep No matter how long ago it was, it's the final of one of the major European club competitions, and should at least be linked to from the Cup Winners Cup article, from the list of finals there (I'm assuming there is one.) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Keeno (talk • contribs)
 * How does that make it notable? There are some matches that truly deserve their own articles, such as the 1966 World Cup Final, the Jahrhundertspiel or the England v Hungary (1953) match, but what is so special about this CWC final that it deserves its own article? -- Elisson • Talk 00:07, 8 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment Usually I'm not a deletionist, but, really, IMHO it is quite stupid to make articles of every final match. Just relevant ones, like the 1966 world cup final, and, for example, Italy-Germany 4-3 (1970 world cup semifinal, considered among the most amusing matches ever). But, please, not every final, or semi-final, match! --Angelo 00:55, 8 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep and improve. I wouldn't want people creating articles for run-of-the-mill league matches, but European finals are notable enough to have their own articles.  It's not very good at the moment, but I could see this becoming a very good article given time. [[Image:Yemen flag large.png|24px]] CTOAGN (talk) 00:13, 8 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Merge with UEFA Cup Winners' Cup 1971-72 (when created), as with 1960-61, 1961-62, 1962-63, 1963-64, 1964-65. No need for the match to have its own page apart from the tournament page unless it is significantly notable. AlbinoMonkey (Talk) 00:22, 8 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep. Finals of major international club competitions are notable. Carioca 01:06, 8 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep The final of one of the three (as it was then) all Europe football competitions is not a standard game. Choalbaton 02:12, 8 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Merge with UEFA Cup Winners' Cup 1971-72 (or alternatively Rename and expand) as per Albinomonkey. Qwghlm 02:28, 8 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Merge per Albinomonkey -- Thesquire (talk - contribs) 05:57, 8 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Merge per Albinomonkey. Create articles about several finals, not just one final per article.  - MB (Talk)  11:55, 8 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep as it is. Individual articles are more flexible for linking and categorising. It's already in Rangers' category and the Moscow club will probably have its own category some time. The Rangers article will get far too large and will not be able to contain all the content about the history of Rangers. Rangers F.C. already has an article size warning, so things need to be taken out, not added in. The coverage of the history of Manchester United already runs to 6 large articles. Bhoeble 14:11, 8 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Then why not do a similar article series for the history of Rangers F.C.? The final is of course worty of mention on Wikipedia, but IMHO, it is not worthy a separate article. -- Elisson • Talk 15:04, 8 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep and improve Palx 15:08, 8 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep per above. -- JJay 07:29, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep less notable than superbowl, but still...  Grue   14:37, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep per Bhoeble --Loopy e 21:12, 12 January 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.