Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1989–90 Real Madrid CF season


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. No evidence of copyvio. Wasting people's time. &mdash;Dark 01:58, 21 October 2022 (UTC)

1989–90 Real Madrid CF season

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Season-article without any sources for the season (matches) itself. Suspicion of copyvio due to unsourced copying. The Banner talk 16:01, 19 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions.  The Banner  talk 16:01, 19 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep this article meets WP:NSEASONS requirements since three years ago. Also, nomination is flawed, biased, and with false claims of being unsourced even when everybody who reads the article can verify it that is properly sourced with several references. I wrote the article three years ago and I've never received this false-based nominations by the same user who is clearly not acting in good faith. He nominated to delete my 10 articles with false claims of being unsourced and not reaching any consensus with the same user voting in every AfD. It is unbelievable consensus against my articles is 1-0 in the 10 Afd discussions. The decision to nominate was inconsistent with the treatment of the articles for all NSEASONS and as such appears capricious in nature. The article should be published status without delay. HugoAcosta9 (talk) 16:04, 19 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Spain-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:06, 19 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep: A season for an international football power such as Real Madrid is highly notable, and the nom cannot possibly have satisfied WP:BEFORE -- I would be startled if there were as few as a thousand sources (and a casual GNews search in Spanish turned up over seven thousand). Nor do I see any attempt by the nom to source it or tag it.  Beyond that, an accusation of copyvio based on nothing more than a lack of sources is poor faith, and should be stricken immediately.   Ravenswing      19:09, 19 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 21:00, 19 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep - Silly nomination as this article covers an unusual season where the club won a domestic double, finished runner's up in the domestic cup, and set the single season goal-scoring mark in the league. There is WP:SIGCOV on the season, such as these recent articles: and . Based on the number of similar poor nominations today, I think the nominator ought to perform WP:BEFORE searches or seek input from more experienced editors before making additional similar nominations. Jogurney (talk) 21:53, 19 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep: Same reasons as above. Gusfriend (talk) 10:13, 20 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep, borderline speedily. There is zero scenario wherein I see this being deleted as sourcing about this very successful season does indeed exist. I'm unable to identify any evidence of copyvio. Star   Mississippi  16:43, 20 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep - ludicrous nomination. Prominent sports team, playing in Spain's top football division - and the sources are there to support that. Might need improving, but not deleting. GiantSnowman 18:58, 20 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep, passes NSEASON.--Ortizesp (talk) 21:11, 20 October 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.