Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1992 Kazakhstan Cup Final


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to 1992 Kazakhstan Cup. Liz Read! Talk! 22:20, 24 November 2022 (UTC)

1992 Kazakhstan Cup Final

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

"individual season notability" may be "insufficient for an article, with an existing article covering the topic of "Kazakhstan Cup." This is one of many individual season entries here; with many omissions.  The reference section of the article illustrates that individual seasons were not covered consistently. Flibbertigibbets (talk) 22:38, 17 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. Flibbertigibbets (talk) 22:38, 17 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Football and Kazakhstan. Shellwood (talk) 11:07, 18 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 00:54, 19 November 2022 (UTC)


 * Comment I am a little unsure what to make of this, it's possible the sourcing for this is more WP:OFFLINESOURCES. However that means there will be serious issues here as we honestly can't know what kind of coverage there will be for this region of the world. Kazakhstan is not really known for it's football. Maybe a soft redirect to Kazakhstan Cup. But that article also has serious notability issues. There is only one link on the page in question which can easily be missed which is the report in the middle of the squad list. Not exactly helpful for sure. Govvy (talk) 06:44, 19 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Redirect to 1992 Kazakhstan Cup, probably doesn't need a separate article. GiantSnowman 13:46, 19 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Redirect per above.--Ortizesp (talk) 05:47, 23 November 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.