Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1993–94 New York Rangers broadcasters


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. Per G5, as this was created by a sock of a blocked user, though there's also a consensus to delete it on its merits. TheCatalyst31 Reaction•Creation 05:11, 13 November 2016 (UTC)

1993–94 New York Rangers broadcasters

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Broadcast information is already in the yearly article. The rest of the article is a blank section of things already in the yearly article. Duplicate article that isn't necessary. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 00:40, 6 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ice hockey-related deletion discussions. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 00:42, 6 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 00:42, 6 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 00:42, 6 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 00:42, 6 November 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete: Not necessary to split. — MRD2014 (talk • contribs) 02:26, 6 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete Should be and is included on the season article. Article created by a user that is block evading and whom was blocked for disruptive edits. He is well known for his edits to 1994 New York Rangers topics. -DJSasso (talk) 16:57, 10 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Redirect to 1993–94 New York Rangers season. It's a plausible thing that people might be searching for, but not worthy of its own article. Smartyllama (talk) 19:58, 10 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete: better kept within context of the season article. isaacl (talk) 05:40, 11 November 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.