Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1994–95 Club Universidad Nacional season


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Star  Mississippi  13:42, 26 October 2022 (UTC)

1994–95 Club Universidad Nacional season

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Season-article without any sources for the season itself The Banner  talk 19:11, 5 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions.  The Banner  talk 19:11, 5 October 2022 (UTC)


 * Excuse me Mister user:Bruxton Hello Sir, I've created The article 1994-95 Club Universidad Nacional season and you reviewed during autumn, now The Banner and his friends wants to delete the article even it is properly sourced. Can you post that the article is not unsourced?. Thank you. HugoAcosta9 (talk) 20:36, 5 October 2022 (UTC)
 * False. Again, I've showed and explained the sources one by one, the references are journals, TV stations, the structure of the article, the links and now they created a new term: "coverage", maybe tomorrow they will create another one to delete the article. My article was reviewed by wikipedia users and also, approved, now is censored with new terms. The article clearly is not "unsourced" it clearly has 7 sources/references/links according to the wikipedia rules. HugoAcosta9 (talk) 20:44, 5 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Greetings Mister The Banner, regards the matches, positions by round subsection, results by round subsection the source came from RSSSF https://www.rsssf.org/tablesm/mex95.html it is the same used by 1994-95 Mexican Primera Division season and it is detailed by the Spanish version of that article, then I structured the matches section based on that info. The source it is included now. HugoAcosta9 (talk) 22:03, 5 October 2022 (UTC)
 * 1) The part about the season is still unsourced.
 * 2) RSSSF is copyright protected. So just copying is not allowed. The Banner  talk 09:55, 6 October 2022 (UTC)


 * Keep -The article was reviewed by user:Onel5969 and includes 7 references/sources/links. The Competitions section links two tables to 1994-95 Mexican Primera Division season the subsection results by round or position by round is properly sourced and linked to https://www.rsssf.org/tablesm/mex95.html same applies to subsection Matches. It is not copyviolation due to it does not exist a similar page on RSSSF, there is a Overall page including 259 teams and hundreds of matches. However my article contains only the matches for the club in question and I did not copy from that site and paste over here, I use the info even it is clear is not the same. Also, that information is available on the Wikipedia Spanish version of 1994-95 Mexican Primera Division season. HugoAcosta9 (talk) 16:53, 6 October 2022 (UTC)
 * False. They states: "You are free to copy this document in whole or part provided that proper acknowledgement is given to the authors. All rights reserved." Acknowledgements properly included. HugoAcosta9 (talk) 17:30, 6 October 2022 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 22:27, 12 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Mexico-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 21:27, 6 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 21:31, 6 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found please ping me. GiantSnowman 20:27, 7 October 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Relisting comment: Given how contentious these turned, plus an external keep !voter, willing to give another spin Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Star   Mississippi  01:26, 20 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep - I was able to find a source about the season. In the newspaper article they describe how the young team fared for the season.
 * "Macias, J. L. (1995, May 17). Arranca la liguilla final:Santos-chivas y UNAM-cruz azul. La Opinión Retrieved from https://library.umaine.edu/auth/EZproxy/test/authej.asp?url=https://search.proquest.com/newspapers/arranca-la-liguilla-final-santos-chivas-y-unam/docview/368267239/se-2" — Preceding unsigned comment added by Inomyabcs (talk • contribs)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Keep: This AfD of a top-flight domestic league season in Mexico isn't quite so egregiously bad as The Banner going after Real Madrid seasons (for pity's sake), but it is far from good. Nom plainly hadn't the faintest notion of meeting his obligations under WP:BEFORE, nor any legitimate basis to accuse the article creator of copyvio.  A casual search turns up many sources.  Why wasn't this even attempted before the nomination? Deletion is not for cleanup of the article.   Ravenswing      02:08, 20 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep per NSEASONS. It looks like some sources have been found, there are probably more out there. Royal Autumn Crest (talk) 11:31, 20 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep Its implausible that there wouldn't be references for the season of one of the top teams on the continent. Nfitz (talk) 00:54, 23 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep I do believe it meets WP:GNG. There's at least one reference in the article that supports it, plus I did find this one. Most sources would probably be offline and in Spanish, so harder to find, but there's already enough to verify that this is notable. OliveYouBean (talk) 11:54, 26 October 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.