Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1994–95 Tecos F.C. season


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 06:44, 20 October 2022 (UTC)

1994–95 Tecos F.C. season

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Season article without sources for the actual season (matches etc.). Possibly copyvio. The Banner talk 10:00, 6 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions.  The Banner  talk 10:00, 6 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Mexico-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 10:07, 6 October 2022 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  12:24, 13 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep -The article was reviewed by user:Bruxton and includes 7 references/sources/links. The Competitions section links two tables to 1994-95 Mexican Primera Division season the subsection results by round or position by round is properly sourced and linked to https://www.rsssf.org/tablesm/mex95.html same applies to subsection Matches. It is not copyviolation due to it does not exist a similar page on RSSSF, there is a Overall page including 259 teams and hundreds of matches. However my article contains only the matches for the club in question. Also, that information is available on the Wikipedia Spanish version of 1994-95 Mexican Primera Division season. RSSSF states: "You are free to copy this document in whole or part provided that proper acknowledgement is given to the authors. All rights reserved." Acknowledgements properly included. HugoAcosta9 (talk) 16:47, 6 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 21:34, 6 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found please ping me. GiantSnowman 20:28, 7 October 2022 (UTC)
 * False. There are four sources: |title=Mexico 1994/95,, , in the Summary Section plus three more. HugoAcosta9 (talk) 02:44, 9 October 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Keep per HugoAcosta9, this article meets NSEASONS requirements. Royal Autumn Crest (talk) 18:37, 13 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep In-season source examples. Preview of the wild-card match on 10 May 1995 and previous form found below.
 * "Macias, J. L. (1995, May 10). Veracruz y puebla abren el fuego: Tambien hoy, monterrey-tecos en el repechaje. La Opinión Retrieved from https://library.umaine.edu/auth/EZproxy/test/authej.asp?url=https://search.proquest.com/newspapers/veracruz-y-puebla-abren-el-fuego-tambien-hoy/docview/368160315/se-2"
 * Contract talk between the wildcard match and the quarter finals.
 * "Lopez, I. (1995, May 31). Inquietan los tecos a verdirame. El Norte Retrieved from https://library.umaine.edu/auth/EZproxy/test/authej.asp?url=https://search.proquest.com/newspapers/inquietan-los-tecos-verdirame/docview/316387849/se-2"
 * Preview of the semifinal with a prediction that Tecos would lose and not make it back to the final.
 * "Cervantez, R. (1995, May 20). OPINIONES. La Opinión Retrieved from https://library.umaine.edu/auth/EZproxy/test/authej.asp?url=https://search.proquest.com/newspapers/opiniones/docview/368159284/se-2"


 * Keep: This AfD of a top-flight domestic league season in Mexico isn't quite so egregiously bad as The Banner going after Real Madrid seasons (for pity's sake), but it is far from good. Nom plainly hadn't the faintest notion of meeting his obligations under WP:BEFORE, nor any legitimate basis to accuse the article creator of copyvio.  A casual search turns up many sources.  Why wasn't this even attempted before the nomination?   Ravenswing      02:05, 20 October 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.