Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1996 Sarajevo tram attack


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   merge to Siege of Sarajevo. Stifle (talk) 15:16, 21 February 2014 (UTC)

1996 Sarajevo tram attack

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Virtually the entire text of this article can be found in a section of the page Siege of Sarajevo. Thousands of events similar to this one occurred during the siege, which is why I fail to see the notability of this attack in of itself (even if it did occur after the war had ended.) 23 editor (talk) 22:59, 12 February 2014 (UTC)


 * Redirect to Siege of Sarajevo. That article isn't sectioned particularly well right now, but once that gets fixed, this can become a R to section. --Joy &#91;shallot&#93; (talk) 14:49, 13 February 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep The article is about an act of war happened after the Dayton Agreement so was an important fact.User:Lucifero4
 * You would support having an article for every single incident during the Siege of Sarajevo? 23 editor (talk) 19:37, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
 * An attack after the Dayton agreement is different fromothers attacks.User:Lucifero4
 * Not particularly. 1 killed and 19 wounded, while tragic, is not very different from thousands of other attacks throughout the city from 1992 to 1996 in which 10,000 people were killed. The fact that it was after the Dayton agreement doesn't change that. There were dozens of incidents after the Kosovo War, for example, in which people were killed by both ethnic groups involved in that conflict, yet not each incident merits a Wikipedia article. Like I said, virtually the entire text of this article can be found in a paragraph at Siege of Sarajevo. 23 editor (talk) 22:05, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bosnia and Herzegovina-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:37, 14 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:37, 14 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:37, 14 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:37, 14 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Terrorism-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:37, 14 February 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep - Lucifero4 is right this happened after the Dayton Agreement and is by that fact a notable event. But more input needed.--BabbaQ (talk) 16:42, 16 February 2014 (UTC)

It may have happened after the Dayton Agreement, but it did not happen after the Siege of Sarajevo (which was declared over on 29 February 1996). Need I say more? 23 editor (talk) 18:35, 16 February 2014 (UTC)


 * Merge with Siege of Sarajevo. Its a stubb, it did happen during the siege of Sarajevo. I see no reasson to delete it but its way better to merge it with the already existing article. I also fail to see what Dayton agreement has to do with this article. Dayton was an agreement but the siege ended 29 of February not the same moment Dayton was signed.Stepojevac (talk) 19:48, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.