Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1998 Capital Taxi Aereo plane crash


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 04:09, 8 June 2020 (UTC)

1998 Capital Taxi Aereo plane crash

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Tragic but cargo plane accidents are very common. Fails WP:EVENT as there is no lasting effect. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 19:08, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 19:08, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 19:08, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Aviation-related deletion discussions. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 19:08, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Brazil-related deletion discussions. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 19:08, 31 May 2020 (UTC)


 * Draftify again - The article as it stands was moved to mainspace from draftspace 16 hours before this AfD but is undersourced. This could easily have had a lasting impact in Brazil as it hit a house and was the first loss of a Brazilian aircraft type, but it needs better sourcing to support this. I'm not willing to categorise this as "non-notable" due to a lack of Brazilian records search, it may be, it may not be, but I don't think it's ready for mainspace. SportingFlyer  T · C  19:21, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Comment This is a very minor cargo plane crash with limited ground casualties. Take for instance this South America 1976 crash that killed 88 people on the ground besides the 707 crew of three. BTW that crash doesn't even have a WP article....William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 19:38, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
 * The Bolivian crash likely should have an article, that's proof of nothing. Anyways, there's still a chance this is notable, and given it was freshly moved from draftspace, I don't see any harm with just moving it back. SportingFlyer  T · C  19:49, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete without prejudice . As with many articles based on a single source, it reproduces that source, ASN in this case.  The sourced parts of the article are a close paraphrase and several rearranged word-for-word copies.  The incident is already mentioned EMB 120 article, and there is very little worth preserving without source-based evidence of stand-alone significance. • Gene93k (talk) 23:40, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
 * additional comment. After looking at the corresponding pt.Wikipedia article and searching for RS coverage, I am convinced this crash was a breaking news event with only routine follow up. Lasting RS interest in the event and the significance of the crash as the first of that aircraft's variant do not appear to be evident.  Fails WP:NEVENT. • Gene93k (talk) 20:28, 1 June 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete No WP:LASTING coverage. Azuredivay (talk) 02:08, 1 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom --Cornellier (talk) 17:21, 2 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete there is not enough coverage from independent reliable secondary sources. Also per WP:NEVER and WP:NOTNEWS. Bolhones (talk) 18:24, 2 June 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.