Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1:30 am


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Withdrawn by nominator in light of not taking the claimed awards into consideration (I think they were added after I nominated the article). Signalizing (talk) 14:47, 19 August 2013 (UTC) Signalizing (talk) 14:47, 19 August 2013 (UTC)

1:30 am

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Obligatory AfD, after a PROD template was removed regarding notability concerns. This obscure short film falls short on all of the five points set in WP:NFILM. Signalizing (talk) 12:32, 16 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 12:59, 16 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:41, 16 August 2013 (UTC)


 * Comment: Did you fail to notice the 5 awards claimed in the article? That claim, if verified appropriately, is good enough for keeping the article. §§ Dharmadhyaksha §§ {T/C} 14:07, 18 August 2013 (UTC)
 * I concur, but the filmmaker's choice for title creates many false positives.  Schmidt,  Michael Q. 08:24, 19 August 2013 (UTC)
 * That's right. I have, hence, not been able to do through search for material. But i thought i should at least put this note so other editors start thinking in that direction. §§ Dharmadhyaksha §§ {T/C} 11:55, 19 August 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.