Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1: Nenokkadine (soundtrack)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to 1: Nenokkadine. And possibly merge from history.  Sandstein  21:11, 15 November 2016 (UTC)

1: Nenokkadine (soundtrack)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Redundant with major relevant content already present at main article 1: Nenokkadine. Fails WP:CFORK. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 10:26, 7 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 10:27, 7 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 10:27, 7 November 2016 (UTC)

The soundtrack article was created as the main article had grown too large. Oh god, what a crime. Kailash29792 (talk) 10:30, 7 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Avoid vague arguments. Please provide sizes in your arguments to enable others value it. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 10:39, 7 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Redirect/merge into 1: Nenokkadine - From quick glance, there seems to be enough reliable sources to warrant the existence of the topic. However, I do believe that it can be merged into 1: Nenokkadine. As an example, merging the track listing and release section into the main article would not be harmful. The readable prose size of 1: Nenokkadine is 22 kB, while the readable prose size of the soundtrack article is only 1094 B. WP:SIZERULE says that length alone does not justify division. Therefore, a merge would be appropriate. —SomeoneNamedDerek (talk) 04:14, 8 November 2016 (UTC)


 * Redirect/merge to 1: Nenokkadine: Can be adjusted in parent article. Above size-analysis gives more insight into issue (however I don't agree with "enough" rs thing. Most of cited sources are of questionable-reliability). Anup   [Talk]  11:03, 8 November 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.