Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1C:Enterprise


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) ~ Ase1este charge-paritytime 02:33, 18 February 2021 (UTC)

1C:Enterprise

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Notability questionable. Citations currently used seem to focus more on the company itself, or are just posts on Medium and similar pages. This is probably the best around, but I'm still not sure. User has made no other edits other than to this page. Page was previously a redirect. talk to ! dave 13:07, 3 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 14:05, 3 February 2021 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * I would keep the article. We have lots of secondary sources on other wiki-languages as well. For example,, , , , etc. 1C:Enterprise has quite wide coverage which, I think, is not preferable to put it to 1C Company and redirect again to there. The best option is to split sections. Also, editor's contribution history is not an issue for Wikipedia's policies. Past editors always come and go, like me. Best regards, Leanko (talk) 13:46, 4 February 2021 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 15:40, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep or Merge into parent company - whether or not people believe this deserves an article, there is some useful information here. Foxnpichu (talk) 22:40, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep. Maybe the sources are not properly used, however, I see Google gives 12 500 000 results for 1C:Enterprise and Google Scholar 2 130 results. Sincerely, Գարիկ Ավագյան (talk) 07:42, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Remember that Google results don’t necessarily equal notability. Foxnpichu (talk) 23:31, 12 February 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.