Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1 Special Training Unit


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 22:50, 26 July 2023 (UTC)

1 Special Training Unit

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

The article is unsourced. I was unable to find any relevant sources. Charsaddian (talk) 20:20, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Military and South Africa. Skynxnex (talk) 20:48, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete I cannot find any reliable sources that provide any detail on this unit. I would also draw editors' attention to WP:MILUNIT which provides some general guidance for the notability of military units. This one does not appear to meet the suggestion of "Land forces units that are capable of undertaking significant, or independent, military operations". My understanding is that it is a physical training unit. It could be covered in some detail in an article about the parent formation, which may have been a training establishment or directorate. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 01:01, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Comment This seems to be linked to Danie Craven, maybe some biographies of his life could be helpful sources. Park3r (talk) 02:02, 26 July 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.