Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1 billion hungry campaign


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Wizardman 00:39, 6 December 2009 (UTC)

1 billion hungry campaign

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

No reliable sources for this campaign. Article then appears to be about related stuff and not what the articles title states. Polargeo (talk) 16:58, 12 November 2009 (UTC)
 * This also may be a recreation of an 1 billion hungry petition which was speedily deleted Polargeo (talk) 17:03, 12 November 2009 (UTC)

Reliable sources have been added. The page is about a humanitarian campaign and in line with similar pages of other UN/humanitarian organizations. user:Lowpet —Preceding undated comment added 11:09, 13 November 2009 (UTC).

As this campaign is clearly identified as an FAO initiative 1billionhungry, 1billionhungry.org, not dated linked to the World Summit on Food Security 2009 why not move this article into the World Summit article? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.45.195.128 (talk) 18:57, 17 November 2009 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Tim Song (talk) 00:34, 19 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NW ( Talk ) 03:21, 26 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Seems like a merge to World Summit on Food Security 2009 is probably the best idea. Glass  Cobra  23:26, 25 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. allen四names 05:04, 26 November 2009 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  So Why  13:50, 4 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete as per nom. More about the FAO than topic. If there is anything worth keeping, move it to FAO. -- P 1 9 9 • TALK 20:05, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Delete per nom, though maybe paraphrasing it and putting it in the FAO article would be worthwhile. SMC (talk) 11:15, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.